Tidings Logo
Tidings Online News
home pageNews Viewpoints Spirituality Liturgy Entertainment Calendar Sports
Google
at google.com
at the-tidings.com
THIS WEEK'S
HIGHLIGHTS
News
Catholic Relief Services: Growing global solidarity
Federal immigration raids: 'These are shameful'
A meaningful rededication at San Gabriel Mission
Catholic voters: A somewhat contradictory statistical look
Providence signs agreement to acquire Tarzana hospital
Justice & Peace issues include immigration, restorative justice
Pope, in year of St. Paul, says apostle should serve as model
bullet St. John's to honor five at Distinguished Alumni Dinner
bullet Newsbriefs

Viewpoints
At the nuclear crossroads, 40 years later
bullet A major disservice to California, again
bullet Why the embryo matters
bullet An anthem switch?
bullet Coping with changes in leadership
Liturgy
Carrying the burden
Spirituality
bullet A papal theme: The Christian duty to evangelize
bullet Our innate pathological complexity
shim
Entertainment
shim Good Summer Reading: Award Winning Books
shim Movie Reviews
Sports
CYO promotes PLC 'sports as ministry' program

 

 

 


Friday, July 27, 2007
State marriage initiatives approved by attorney general

By R. W. Dellinger
text only version

Three state-wide initiatives defining marriage and eliminating domestic partnership rights have recently been approved for circulation by the California attorney general's office. But the measures may never make the ballot because of funding problems, according to the California Catholic Conference (CCC).

While the first two initiatives, or proposed constitutional amendments, state that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California, the second also declares, "This provision shall not affect the rights, benefits and obligations conferred by California law on other domestic relationships." ProtectMarriage.com is the major sponsor of both initiatives.

The third initiative also provides that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. But it "voids or makes unenforceable certain rights and obligations conferred by California law on same-sex and opposite-sex couples registered as domestic partners," including community property, interstate succession, stepparent adoption, child custody and support, hospital visitation, health care decisions for an incapacitated partner, insurance and death benefits, and recovery for wrongful death.

All three initiatives need nearly 695,000 signatures by mid-December to qualify for the June 2008 ballot.

The California Catholic Conference is co-sponsoring the first and second initiatives.

The third is sponsored by the Campaign for California Families (VoteYesMarriage.com). "We do not work with them as their tone, tactics and rhetoric are disturbing," explained Carol Hogan, the CCC's Pastoral Projects and Communications Director. "Their initiative - which 'defines' what a man is and what a woman is, and which rescinds domestic partnership - is also facing fund-raising challenges."

Hogan pointed out that as a matter of protocol California bishops make no "statement of support for or opposition to" when a proposed initiative is issued until it has qualified for the ballot.

The legality of "gay marriage" and the applicability of Proposition 22, the 2000 initiative declaring that only marriage between a man and women is valid and recognized in California, is pending in a consolidated case before the state's supreme court.



copyright The Tidings Corporation ©2004
Contact us at: info@the-tidings.com




give us your comments




past issues