|
Second of two parts; 15th in a series.
Myths About the Church
Myth: The abuse is a result of the seminary
training after the Second Vatican Council (1963-65). Fact: Almost
70 percent of the abusive priests were ordained before 1970,
after attending pre-Vatican II seminaries or seminaries that
had had little time to adapt to the reforms of Vatican II.
Myth: This problem is unique to the Catholic Church:
Fact: The John Jay report notes that in the period 1992-2000,
the number of substantiated sexual abuse cases in American
society as a whole has been between 89,355 and 149,800 annually.
At a minimum, this number for one year is eight times the
total number of alleged abuses in the church over a period
of 52 years.
Myth: The abuse is still going on at the same rate.
Fact: The number of alleged abuses increased in the 1960's,
peaked in the 70's, declined in the 80's and by the 90's had
returned to the levels of the 1950's.
The more the
problem is studied, the more likely it is that the church
will change from being part of the problem to being
part of the solution to the epidemic of sexual abuse
in our country.
|
Myth: The Catholic Church has been slower to respond
to this crisis than the rest of American society. Fact: The
John Jay study reports that for the country as a whole the
number of substantiated sexual abuse cases peaked at approximately
149,800 in 1992 and declined by 2 percent to 11 percent per
year through 2000. Since sexual abuse in the church appears
to have peaked in the 1970's and declined in the 80's and
90's, the church seems to have been ahead of the rest of American
society.
Myth: Billions of dollars have been spent by the
church dealing with this crisis. Fact: Though the cost may
eventually reach a billion dollars, the figure reported by
John Jay was $472,507,094.
Myth: The church is spending more money on treating
priests and hiring lawyers than on the victims. Fact: 83 percent
of the amount spent by the church went to compensation for
victims; another 4 percent went to treatment for victims.
Myth: The church knew about these allegations from
the very beginning. Fact: According to the John Jay report,
one-third of the accusations were made in the years 2002-3.
Two-thirds have been reported since 1993. "Thus, prior to
1993, only one-third of cases were known to church officials,"
says the report.
Myth: The bishops should leave this problem to the
criminal justice system. Fact: When allegations were made
known to the police, only one in three accused priests was
charged with a crime; only 3 percent of all priests with allegations
served prison time. There seems to be no correlation between
the severity of the offense and whether the alleged victim
contacted the police or whether the priest was ultimately
charged or convicted, according to the report.
Myth: The abusive priests always/never received treatment.
Fact: Nearly 40 percent of priests alleged to have committed
sexual abuse participated in treatment programs. The more
allegations a priest had, the more likely he was to participate
in treatment, according to the report.
More Research Needed
The John Jay report, which covers the period of 1950-2002,
is an excellent first step in the research on this problem,
but it raises as many questions as it answers:
~ 4,392 priests (4 percent of the clergy) were accused of
sexual abuse. Is this better or worse than other professions
--- teachers, social workers, scout leaders, doctors, lawyers,
psychologists --- or the total male population? No one knows,
because comparable studies have not been done.
~ 10,667 individuals reported abuse. Are there more victims?
Definitely. The bishops could report only on those who had
come forward. One-third of the allegations were reported in
2002-3. How many more are out there?
~ A few serial abusers (147) were responsible for a quarter
of all allegations. Why were these men not spotted and dealt
with by other priests and church officials?
~ More than half the priests had only one allegation against
them. Is this because their names were never made public,
or were they truly one-time offenders? Would it be safe to
return any of these men to ministry?
~ The number of alleged abuses increased in the 1960s, peaked
in the '70s, declined in the '80s and by the '90s were at
the levels of the 1950s. Were there more cases prior to 1960
that simply were not reported or recorded? Will there be more
cases reported for the '90s as time goes on? Or did most bishops
get their act together in the late '80s, so that most abusers
were dealt with and potential abusers were not ordained?
~ Fewer religious priests (2.5 percent) had allegations
against them than diocesan priests (4.3 percent). Is the "Lone
Ranger" model of priestly life detrimental to the life of
celibacy?
~ Eighty-one percent of the victims were male. Why? What
role does homosexuality play in this crisis? There is no hard
data on what percentage of the clergy is homosexual, because
the bishops refuse to allow such a study.
~ Was there a higher incidence of abuse by priests who entered
the seminary at a younger age --- that is, who entered high
school seminaries --- compared with those who entered college
or post-college seminaries?
~
Did the treatment programs to which abusive priests were sent
have an impact on reducing abuse?
What Next?
The John Jay report can be only the beginning, not the end,
of research on the problem of sexual abuse in the church.
The more the problem is studied, the more likely it is that
the church will change from being part of the problem to being
part of the solution to the epidemic of sexual abuse in our
country, where 20 percent of women and 15 percent of men report
that they were victims of child sexual abuse as children,
with about 80 percent of the victims saying they were violated
by a family member.
Jesuit Father Thomas J. Reese is the former editor in chief of America Magazine. This article is reprinted from America, Mar. 22, 2004 with the permission of America Press, Inc. (c) 2004. All rights reserved. For subscription information, visit www.americamagazine.org.
|