| Californians quickly learn that we must be prepared for earthquakes, droughts, fires and high housing prices. This year, we face another of those unique California pursuits --- complex ballot initiatives.
On November 8, voters will be asked to decide on union dues, teacher tenure, low-cost prescription drugs, parental notification prior to an abortion, redistricting and how California's budget and electricity should be managed.
Eight initiatives, all on complicated and weighty questions, have qualified for the November ballot. Currently, another 60 are circulating for future ballots.
My Catholic faith and the traditions of the Catholic Church come first. All choices have a moral and ethical component to them, so I evaluate the initiatives on how they will impact the poor, the aged, the sick and other vulnerable groups.
|
Being prepared for a natural disaster is critical, but being prepared for deciding on these initiatives can be just as important. Our political choices have repercussions for years to come, impact our families and have severe consequences for the poor.
Thanks to my wife, we have bottled water and canned food in our garage, so I feel somewhat prepared for a disaster. But despite these precautions, we really haven't done enough --- there's always something else more immediate, more fun, or just more "important."
Like many of us in postponing disaster preparation, our elected officials don't always deal with of our state's long-term challenges. Progress can be slow, sometimes non-existent, in dealing with critical issues. Politics is the art of compromise, but finding solutions in today's polarized political landscape, often just doesn't happen.
The initiative process allows the electorate --- you and me --- to create law and bypass the legislature. Sometimes it's the only way to get things moving but it can also be a tool of special interest, a political weapon or a jobs program for political consultants. And, of course, political decisions do not always reflect our Catholic values.
Take Proposition 187, an anti-immigrant measure from 1994. It was declared unconstitutional four years after voter approval and it certainly was not consistent with the commandment to "welcome the stranger" found in the Gospel of Matthew.
Proposition 13, the legendary 1978 property tax initiative that jumpstarted the use of initiatives, is now one of the icons of California politics. Tampering with it --- despite some very valid reasons to do so --- has become tantamount to political suicide.
Things are a little different today in Sacramento. The traditional budget battle fizzled. Not because everyone suddenly joined together in the spirit of harmony and goodwill --- I'd be immediately suspicious if they did --- but because political camps are saving their ammunition for the November battle.
The special election is part of the Governor's Year of Reform. He is attempting to fix what he considers "broken" with California, appealing to the voters to address what he believes the legislature has not.
The Governor and the legislature are still jockeying for position. They may come up with a compromise and place additional questions on the ballot or cancel the election completely.
Between now and November 8, we will be bombarded with slogans, slick campaigns, misleading advertisements, and other standard electioneering skullduggery.
My preferred method for deciding how to vote is the same method I use for significant discernment:
My Catholic faith and the traditions of the Catholic Church come first. All choices have a moral and ethical component to them, so I evaluate the initiatives on how they will impact the poor, the aged, the sick and other vulnerable groups.
For instance, Catholic Charities provides emergency utility assistance to those in need. I'll look at how the proposed changes in electricity regulation will impact those most in need.
Since I am not an expert on the vast majority of initiative questions --- I cringe every time I have to decide on some esoteric section of the insurance code --- I'll turn to trusted, knowledgeable sources for guidance.
Even
partisan analysis or emotion-evoking ads can be useful as
long as the sponsor's spin is known. Unfortunately, sometimes
it's harder to find out who the sponsor is than to decide
how to vote.
And I like to talk through the issues with people --- send up controversial "trial balloons" to see how people react, what arguments they raise. My eldest son is particularly valuable for this since he keeps up on myriad issues every day. Basically, it's akin to asking the smartest student in the class for tutoring help.
So let's do two things this summer: get those earthquake supplies ready and start becoming familiar with the issues we will decide upon in November. Steve Pehanich is the executive director of Catholic Charities of California. He supports public policy and other initiatives for the 12 Catholic Charities agencies in the state.
|