|
"If a way to the better
there be, it lies in taking a full look at the worst."
---Thomas Hardy
When I first entered St. John's Seminary as a college student,
I was excited about living with holy men focused on doing
the will of God. I thought that I might "catch" some of the
sanctity of these good men. The disillusionment process was
swift and definitive!
True maturity
is manifested in the manner in which we balance our
inner power and authority with external structures and
persons of power and authority. Perhaps we cannot shepherd
others, only ourselves.
|
What I discovered, to my great dismay, was that these men
were as flawed as I was. They were, like me, a mixture of
God's glory and grime. As time went on, I was forced to humbly
take back my own naive projections on these very normal men.
In Matthew 5:48 we read, "You must therefore be perfect
just as your heavenly Father is perfect." This injunction,
taken out of context, can lead us into an attitude and lifestyle
of perfectionism. Rather than seeking to lead a good and loving
life, doing our own interior work, we are caught in the bind
of trying to be perfect, which is impossible for perfection
--- an impossible goal, since only God is perfect. The notion
of perfectionism continues to flourish, however, through the
familiar and consoling biblical image of the Good Shepherd.
The image of the Good Shepherd is, of course, linked with
sheep. This symbiotic relationship has the potential for idealization
or inflation on the part of the shepherd, and the potential
for deflation or pedestalization of the lamb. The only way
out of this dilemma is to step into the image, and through
it, to a different and richer meaning.
In
biblical tradition, the innocent lamb was sacrificed for a
higher good, and the black sheep was destroyed for the common
good. This still happens in our own time at a symbolical level.
In dealing with any image, even one as dear and sacred as
this, we need to also acknowledge and confront its shadow
side. Wherever there is great light, C.G. Jung observes, there
lurks, close behind, an equally great shadow. The corruption
of the best is the worst.
The problem with the shepherd image is that it has the potential
to create dependent and co-dependent relationships within
an hierarchical framework. Issues of power and control become
primarily externalized, with little personal integration.
The idealization of a particular shepherd can often lead to
the debasing or negation of our own personhood or perspective.
This can create an environment of uncritical thinking, even
in highly intelligent people.
I would like to suggest that in these present days, our
church is in a period of mourning --- a mourning for the loss
of outdated images and ideals of priesthood and shepherding.
This loss is occurring at the same time that society is struggling
to move from an adolescent perspective and experience of conventional
authority, to a more mature and integrated sense of power.
This psychic shift is causing a tremendous upheaval in the
way that people relate --- especially within the church.
We are both shepherd and sheep, often at the same time.
Perhaps, as a church and as a society, we are facing a challenge
to re-invigorate and re-energize the treasured and beloved
shepherd image by honestly and fearlessly exploring the many
and various aspects of this archetypal image and the behaviors
it engenders. This will include looking forthrightly at the
components of power, impotence, naiveté, sexuality and violence
contained within this deceptively simple image.
The model of true perfection is Christ, the one who draws
others to himself. The mature person knows that it is enough
to shepherd oneself, for often the shepherd and the sheep
are equally inept! True maturity is manifested in the manner
in which we balance our inner power and authority with external
structures and persons of power and authority. Perhaps we
cannot shepherd others, only ourselves.
What
one can do, however, is to share the insight and experiences
that one receives from one's own inner work. The best we can
do is model this shepherd image by compassionately caring
for others, rather than taking care of them. An old Southern
Baptist preacher put it this way: "Sometimes yah jes have
to leave 'em where the Lord flung 'em!"
Historically, the shepherd is actually an image of imperfection,
associated with thieving and violence. Perhaps the church
and society need to humbly return to a spirituality of imperfection.
It seems to me that this is already happening in many different
ways through the cracks appearing in both institutions. If
we are able to make this return, the good shepherds might
once again remind us of our true heritage and belonging.
We are first, last and in all our relationships and dealings,
beloved sons and daughters of the God whose call invites,
but does not prescribe, the journey to the perfection that
resides in God alone.
Father Jim Clarke is director of spiritual formation at
St. John's Seminary in Camarillo, and chairperson of the Archdiocesan
Spirituality Commission.
Editor's note: This column begins a six-part series
addressing spiritual issues at the heart of the archdiocese.
Prepared by the Archdiocesan Spirituality Commission, subsequent
articles will examine loss in the face of scandal and tragedy,
loss of trust in ecclesial authorities, growing through the
process of grief, incorporating anger into prayer, and carrying
a scandal biblically as a faith community.
|